.jpg)
printPost-Truth:
Transformation of Political Reality or Self-Destruction of Liberal Democracy?
Chugrov S.V.,
Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Professor, Department of Sociology, leading researcher, Institute of International Studies, MGIMO University; Editor-in-chief of Polis. Political Studies journal Moscow, Russia, s.chugrov@inno.mgimo.ru
elibrary_id: 252110 | ORCID: 0000-0002-8307-7606 | RESEARCHER_ID: E-4747-2016
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.02.04
For citation:
Chugrov S.V. Post-Truth: Transformation of Political Reality or Self-Destruction of Liberal Democracy? – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.02.04
Abstract
The term post-truth that the Oxford Dictionaries named their 2016 Word of the Year, is a sort of a postmodernist modality, a distorted state of consciousness, in which stereotypes have completely lost connection with real images. As a result, the post-truth policy substitutes facts by emotions, news by blatant lies, that set the tone to political discourse and the construction of an alternative reality. The methodology of the article draws heavily on classics of political sociology and communications studies (Le Bon, Merton, Habermas, McLuhan) and innovative research papers (Kõhler, Hodkinson, Sharkov, Solovey) that reveal on the “territory of post-truth” the erosion of the role of facts, proofs, arguments that are pushed aside to the margins of discourse, or just ignored. The author answers the question of who wins and who loses from falsification of truth, tracing the ideological, political, social, and institutional and legal basis for transformation. The author describes the impact of post-truth policies on technology of political process and raises questions: how and on what lines occurs this deformation of consciousness? what is actually broken? how transforms it the political values? There, this post-truth policy transforms the freedom of speech, an immanent value of a liberal society, which is running a risk of degrading and turning into fiction. The erosion of freedom of speech by the inexorable logic of the self-suicidal post-truth policies can lead to a degradation of other key democratic values, in the first place, as shown by the election campaign of Donald Trump, free and democratic elections. The crisis may badly hurt existential values, democratic procedures and institutes as well as global project, international security system and other corner stones of our world order.
Keywords
post-truth; Donald Trump; Russia; political discourse; liberal democracy; Oxford Dictionary; media manipulation; mass media; net-mentality..
References
Alterman E. When Presidents Lie: A History of Official Deception and Its Consequences. N.Y.: Penguin. 2005. 447 p.
Bernays E.L. Manipulating Public Opinion: the Why and the How (Russ. ed.: Bernays E.L. Manipulating Public Opinion: the Why and the How. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No. 4. P. 149-159).
Batorski D., Grzywińska I. Three Dimensions of the Public Sphere on Facebook. – Information, Communication & Society. 2017. No. 1. P. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281329 (accessed 10.02.2017).
Baudrillard J. À l’ombre de la majorité silencieuse, ou la fin du social. (Russ. ed.: Baudrillard J. V teni molchalivogo bol’shinstva, ili konets sotsial’nogo. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural’skogo universiteta. 2010. 100 p.)
Baudrillard J. Simulation et simulacres. (Russ. ed.: Baudrillard J. Simulyatsiya i simulyakry. Moscow: Ripol Klassik. 2015. 320 p.)
Baumann Z. Liquid Life. L.: Polity Press. 2005. 163 p.
Beck U. World Risk Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press. 1999. 184 p.
Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. I: The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 2010. 597 p.
Chugrov S.V. Rossiya i Zapad: Metamorfozy vzaimovospriyatiya [Russia and the West: Metamorphoses of Mutual Perception]. Moscow: Nauka. 1993. 143 p. (In Russ.)
Chugrov S.V. Russian Politics through Prism of Sociological Measurements. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 5. P. 183-191. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.05.16
Coretti L., Pica D. The Rise and Fall of Collective Identity in Networked Movements: Communication Protocols, and Anti-Berlusconi Protest. – Information, Communication & Society. 2015. Vol. 18. No. 8. P. 951-967. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043317 (accessed 02.11.2016).
Crouch C. Post-democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity. 2004. 123 p.
Danilova A.A. Manipulirovanie slovom v sredstvakh massovoi informatsii [Verbal Manipulation in Mass Media]. Moscow: Dobrosvet, KDU Press. 2009. 234 p. (In Russ.)
Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene. (Russ. ed.: Egoistichnyi gen. Moscow: Corpus. 2013. 512 p.)
Diligenskij G., Tschugrow S. Der “Westen” im russischen Bewußtsein. Berichte des Bundesinstituts fűr ostwißenschaftliche und internationale Studien. Köln: Bundesinstitut für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien. 2000. 40 р.
Druzhinin A.M. Ot dialoga k manipulyatsii: kriticheskiy analiz sovremennykh mediapraktik [From Dialogue to Manipulation: a Critical Analysis of Modern Media Practises]. – Philosophical Thought. 2017. № 1. P.1-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2409-8728.2017.1.18534
Foucault M. Governmentality. (Russ. ed.: Foucault M. Pravitel’stvennost’. Moscow: Logos. 2003. No. 4/5. P. 4-22.)
Gaman-Golutvina O.V. Metahisics of Elite Transformations in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No.4. P. 23-40. (In Russ.)
Gorshkov M.K. Rossiiskoe obshchestvo kak ono est’ (opyt sotsiologicheskoi diagnostiki) [Russian Society as It Is (the Experience of Sociological Diagnosis)]. Moscow: The New Chronograph. 2011. 672 p. (In Russ.)
Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp. 2001. 632 p.
Hodkinson P. Media, Culture and Society. An Introduction. L.: Sage. 2011. 320 p.
Hoggan J., Litwin G. I Am Right and You’re an Idiot: The Toxic State of Public Discourse and How to Clean It Up. Gabriola Island (Canada): New Society Publishers. 2016. 160 p.
Husserl E. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. 1970. 405 p.
Jamieson K.H., Cappella J.N. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2008. 301 p.
Kapustin B.G., Myurberg I.I., Fedorova M.M. 2015. Etyudy o svobode. Ponyatie svobody v evropeiskoi obshchestvennoi mysli [Essays on Freedom. Notion of Freedom in European Social Thought]. Moscow: Aquilon, 2015. 287 p. (In Russ.)
Kasavin I.T. Kreativnost’ smysla [Creativity of Sense]. – Kommunikativnaya ratsional’nost’ i sotsial’naya kommunikatsiya. Pod red. I.T. Kasavina, V.N. Porusa [Communicative Rationality and Social Communication. Ed. by I. Kasavin, V. Porus]. Moscow: Alpha-M. 2012. 464 p. (In Russ.)
Keyes R. The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. N.Y.: St. Martin’s. 2004. 325 р.
Köchler H. The New Social Media: Chance or Challenge for Dialogue? – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No. 4. P. 75-87 (In Russ.)
Le Bon G. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Kitchener, Ont.: Batoche Books. 2001. 129 p.
Luhman N. The Reality of the Mass Media. (Russ. ed. Real’nost’ massmedia. Moscow: Praxis. 2005. 256 p.)
McDonald K. From Indymedia to Anonymous: Rethinking Action and Identity in Digital Cultures. – Information, Communication & Society. 2015. Vol. 18. No. 8. P. 968-982.
McLuhan M. Understanding Media. L., N.Y.: Routledge. 2001. 400 p.
Merton P.K. Social Theory and Social Structure. (Russ. ed. Merton P.K. Sotsial’naya teoriya i sotsial’naya struktura. Moscow: AST, Khranitel’. 2006. 880 p.)
Miroshnichenko I.V., Morozova E.V. Network Public Policy: Outlines of Subject Field. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 2. P. 82-102. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.02.05
Reich W. The Mass Psychology of Fascism. N.Y.: Oregon Institute Press. 1946. 344 p.
Rossiya udivlyaet 2015: nastroeniya, suzhdeniya, tsennosti [Russia Surprises: Moods, Judgments, Values]. Moscow: EKSMO. 2016. 208 p. (In Russ.)
Satarov G.A. Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part II. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 2. P. 109-130. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.02.09
Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I. Сlassifying Ethnic Conflicts: Challenges for Political Theory and Methodology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 6. P. 69-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.06.086 (In Russ.)
Sergeev V.M., Artyushkin V.F. Indicators of Innovative Potential of Political and Economic Development. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 6. P. 114-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/ jpps/2016.06.058 (In Russ.)
Sharkov F.I. Visualization of Political Media Space. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 5. P. 97-107. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.05.08 (In Russ.)
Solovei V.D. Absolyutnoe oruzhie. Osnovy psikhologicheskoi voiny i mediamanipulirovaniya [Ultimate Weapon. Basics of Psychological War and Media Manipulation]. Moscow: “E” Publishing House. 2015. 320 p. (In Russ.)
Sztompka P. Socjologia. Analiza społeczeństwa (Russ. ed.: Sztompka P. Sotsiologiya. Analiz sovremennogo obshchestva. Moscow: Logos. 2005. 664 p.)
Content No. 2, 2017
See also:
Kazun A.D., Kazun A.P.,
Neither a Friend. Not a Foe: Donald Trump in the Russian Media. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No1
Pabst A.,
Civilization and Liberal Democracy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No4
Simonia N.A.,
Results of Presidential Elections in the United States and New Prospects for Formation of Multipolar World Order. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No2
Sokolshchik L.M.,
American Conservatism and the Callenge of Contemporary Populism: Theoretical and Ideological Aspects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No1
Lebedeva T.P.,
Liberal Democracy as Orienting Objective for Post-Totalitarian Transformations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No2
.jpg)
.jpg)