Axiology of Education in the Discourse of Contemporary Policy
Voevoda E.V.,
Head of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, MGIMO University, elenavoevoda@yandex.ru
elibrary_id: 546444 |
Belogurov A.Yu.,
Professor, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, MGIMO University, belogurov@mail.ru
elibrary_id: 272455 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.06.12
Voevoda E.V., Belogurov A.Yu. Axiology of Education in the Discourse of Contemporary Policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.06.12
The article addresses the axiological aspect of education in the context of globalization processes. The authors study the main paradigmatic axiological characteristics of contemporary education and their reflection in the discourse of the XXI century political processes. The impetus for consideration was given by the recently published monograph by Pyotr Kasatkin (Kasatkin P.I. Aksiologiya obrazovaniya: arhitektonika sovremennogo obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva [Axiology of Education: Architectonics of Contemporary Education Space]. Moscow: MGIMO-University Publishing House. 2018. 252 p. (In Russ.)), which the authors discuss in view of the new paradigm of higher education with as accent on its policy-making function. The analysis of axiological dimension of contemporary education leads the writer to the conclusion that contemporary knowledge-based society is vitally concerned in profound structural changes in the education system with the vector for the requirements of the state and society. The necessity to reconcile the principles of education policy and socio-cultural demands dictates the need to work out axiological foundations of promoting education as a sphere of developing culture and civilization. In its turn, the dialectics of cultural and civilization strategies generates and constructs the axiomatics of education as a sphere of interdisciplinary research.
References
Bardakov A.I., Polomoshnov A.F., Gurbanov Eh.A.-O. Islam – Political and Socio-Cultural Factor of North Caucasus Development. – Islamovedenie. 2012. No. 2. P. 19-32. (In Russ.)
Bobylo A.M. “Soft Power” in International Policy: Peculiarities of National Strategies. – Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Pedagogy. Philology. Philosophy. 2013. No. 14. P. 129-135. (In Russ.)
Borisova U.S., Okorokova M.P. Students’ Attitude to Democracy. – Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2016. No. 7. P. 8-11. (In Russ.)
Chepurina M.A. Soft Power in World Politics: The Bologna Dimension. – RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2014. No. 1. P. 96-103. (In Russ.)
Kasatkin P.I. Aksiologiya obrazovaniya: arhitektonika sovremennogo obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva [Axiology of Education: Architectonics of Contemporary Education Space]. Moscow: MGIMO-University Publishing House. 2018. 252 p. (In Russ.)
Kasatkin P.I., Ivkina N.V. Cultural and Educational Dimensions of EU Soft Power. – Comparative Politics Journal. 2018. No. 1. P. 26-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2018-00003
Kasatkin P.I., Silantieva M.V. The Anthropological Aspect of Global Education Models: Problems and Solutions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 6. P. 137-149 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.06.10
Lazutina T.V. Politics and Axiology of Education: Formation of the Value System by Means of Philosophy at the Modern Technical University. – Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2016. No. 3. P. 11-13. (In Russ.)
Lebedeva M.M. Political-Forming Function of Higher Education in the Modern World. – Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2006. No. 10. P. 69-75. (In Russ.)
Lebedeva M.M. Soft Power: The Concept and Approaches. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2017. No. 3. P. 212-223. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-3-54-212-223
Metzgar Е.T. Institutions of Higher Education as Public Diplomacy Tools. – Journal of Studies in
International Education. 2015. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 223-241.
Morozov A.V., Vodenko K.V., Sharkov I.G. Interaction Between Education and Religion as a Factor of Promoting Spiritual Security in Contemporary Russian Society. – Humanities of the South of Russia. 2015. No. 1. P. 109-122. (In Russ.)
Pen’kov V.F. On Main Directions of Study of Political Culture and Political Processes in Domestic and Foreign Political Science. – Tambov University Review. Series Humanities. 2014. No. 8. P. 34-50. (In Russ.)
Schneider C.P. Culture Communicates: US Diplomacy That Works. – The New Public Diplomacy Soft Power in International Relations. Ed. by J. Melissen. Palgrave. 2005. P. 147-168.
Silantieva M.V. Edinstvo obucheniya i vospitaniya – strategicheskii prioritet sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Unity of Education and Training as a Strategic Priority of Contemporary Education]. – Obrazovanie kak edinstvo obucheniya i vospitaniya. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii [Education as Unity of Training and Upbringing. Materials of International Scientific Methodological Conference]. Novosibirsk: Siberian Transport University. 2016. P. 53-61. (In Russ.)
Torkunov A.V. Education as a Soft Power Tool in Russian Foreign Policy. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2012. No. 4. P. 85-93. (In Russ.)
Wojciuk A., Michałek M., Stormowska M. Education as a Source and Tool of Soft Power in International Relations. – European Political Science. 2015. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 298-317. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.25
Yarlykapov A.A. Islamic Education in the North Caucasus: Past and Present. – Vestnik Evrazii. 2003. No. 2. P. 6-31. (In Russ.)
See also:
Antyukhova E.A.,
Education in the US “Soft Power” Policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No2
Kubyshkina Ye.V.,
US political discourse under the presidency of G. Bush Jr.: evolution of metaphors. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No1
Andreyev A.L.,
“Soft Power”: Arrangement of Senses, Russian Style. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5
Glinchikova A.G.,
Democratic modernization and national culture. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No6
Liu Zaiqi,
«Soft Power» in China’s Development Strategy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No4