Does Washington Have Any Real Strategy Towards Russia? (Thoughts on the Monograph “Russia and the United States in the Evolving World Order”)
Shaklein V.V.,
Researcher, Institute of the USA and Canada Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, vasily.shaklein@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 476817 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.02.14
Shaklein V.V. Does Washington Have Any Real Strategy Towards Russia? (Thoughts on the Monograph “Russia and the United States in the Evolving World Order”). – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.02.14
Russia and the United States remain decisive players in international relations as members of great power club though America is the superpower. Relations between the countries exert influence on international development, solution of global and regional problems, other countries. Russia is seeking constructive interaction with the United States, America also seemed to have sought the same kind of relations, and however, it turns out that countries have dissimilar understanding of a constructive dialogue, its agenda, and terms of conducting such dialogue. It is often mentioned that the main source of contemporary state of affairs is misunderstanding/misperception. In order to improve the situation, the Russian authors of the monograph Russia and the United States in the Evolving World Order presented their view of such important problems as world order formation, structural trends in many countries and worldwide, policy of the United States and Russia in Asia Pacific region, integration in post-Soviet space, the Crimea case, Russian-American relations per se and their peculiarities in the 21st century. The American contributors analyzed history of bilateral relations, and showed how the messianic idea manifested itself in American and Russian (Soviet) policies. Reading this monograph, Americans can get a more clear idea of how Russian experts evaluate behavior of the United States, and how they explain Russia’s actions and decisions. The authors conclude that though the issue of misperception and misunderstanding is often characterized as the main reason for aggravation of tension in bilateral relations the situation should be explained by dramatic divergences of Russian and American interests, in their vision of the future world order and its institutions. The United States refuses to change its strategy of constructing liberal world order with the use of military methods, and Russia refuses to recognize America’s absolute right to consolidate America-centered order. Their positions make it impossible to have constructive dialogue and interaction. American actions bring instability into bilateral relations and relations with other countries, make international situation fraught with conflicts. The authors see their task in encouraging bilateral dialogue with their American colleagues, first, with those in the United States who are interested and willing to change the situation.
References
Accommodating Rising Powers. Past, Present, and Future. 2016. Ed. by T.V. Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 335 p.
Bacevich A. 2010. Washington Rules. America’s Path to Permanent War. N.Y.: A Metropolitan Book. 286 p.
Challenge and Change. Global Threats and the State in Twenty-first Century International Politics. 2016. Ed. by N.C. Noonan, V. Nadkarni. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 287 p. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48479-6
Hendrickson D. 2018. Republic in Peril. American Empire and the Liberal Tradition. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 304 p.
Legvold R. 2016. Return to Cold War. Malden, MA: Polity Press. 208 p.
Miller Ch. 2019. Understanding Russian Foreign Policy. – Orbis. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 150-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2018.12.012
Pillar P.R. 2016. Why America Misunderstands the World: National Experience and Roots of Misperception. Washington, D.C.: Columbia University Press. 224 p.
Russia and the United States in the Evolving World Order. 2018. Ed. by A. Torkunov et al. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University). Moscow: MGIMO University. 415 p.
Shakleina T. 2016. Cold War as Part of American Global Strategy. – International Trends. Vol. 14. No. 1 (January – March). P. 39-46.
Arbatov A.G. 2018. Threats to Strategic Stability – Imaginary and Real. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 7-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.03.02
Bogaturov A.D. 2017. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i vneshnyaya politika Rossii [International Relations and Russian Foreign Policy]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
Situatsionnye analizy. Vypusk 4: Amerika v fokuse rossiiskikh issledovatelei. Istoriya i sovremennost’[Situational Analyzes. Issue 4: America is in the Focus of Russian Researchers. History and Modernity]. 2014. Moscow: MGIMO-University. (In Russ.)
Vodopyanov K.G. 2018. Suffering Leviathan: What Will Save the Modern State (About the Book by N. Noonan and V. Nadkarni). – Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 182-191. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.03.13
Vvedenie v prikladnoi analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii [Introduction to Applied Analysis of International Situations. Ed. by T. Shakleina]. 2017. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)
See also:
Chugrov S.V.,
Rethinking the Results of World War II in Contemporary Japan. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No5
Lukin A.V.,
Russia and China in Greater Eurasia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No5
Palmowski T., Fedorov G.M.,
Russian-Polish Borderland: Problems and Prospects for the Development of Cross-Border Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No2
Babko N.A.,
The bluest sea in the world: reading Steve Dobransky. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No1
Arapova E.Ya., Khokhlova N.I.,
Regionalization Models in the Asia-Pacific Region. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No5