Regionalization Models in the Asia-Pacific Region

Arapova E.Ya.,

Director of Center of Sanction Policy Expertise, Leading Research Fellow, MGIMO University, arapova_katrin@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 883854 | ORCID: 0000-0001-8765-9825 | RESEARCHER_ID: U-6969-2018

Khokhlova N.I.,

Head of Department, MGIMO University, nataliamgimo@inbox.ru

elibrary_id: 681876 | ORCID: 0000-0002-3470-3201 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.05.05

Rubric: Theme of the Issue: The Attraction of the East

For citation:

Arapova E.Ya., Khokhlova N.I. Regionalization Models in the Asia-Pacific Region. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.05.05

The study was supported by Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), project No. 1921-01-06

Abstract

The article is devoted to the regionalization processes in the Asia-Pacific region through the prism of the theory of the formation of mega-regional blocs. In terms of global and regional leadership, this region is becoming a competitive area between two superpowers: the USA and China; this determines the complexity and multiples levels of regional processes, as well as the formation of several regionalization models that run parallel to each other. The purpose of the article is to compare the approaches taken by the United States and China to the formation of mega-regional blocs in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as to outline the ASEAN approach. As a result, the authors conclude that the US approach to the formation of mega-regional blocs is based on more stringent forms of institutionalization, their opposition to the existing system of global trade regulation led by the WTO, and closed principles; the Chinese approach, however, involves combining formal integration with flexible forms of cooperation in certain areas, reliance on the principles of the WTO, and openness to the involvement of new members. The competition between the two superpowers results in fragmentation and sophistication of regionalization trends, and pushes regional actors to search for new forms of strategic collaboration.

Keywords

globalization, Asia-Pacific region, regional integration, APEC, open regionalism, ASEAN, China, Trans-Pacific Partnership, USA, Regional Comprehensive economic partnership.

Full Text

References

Arapova E. 2015. Measuring “Integration Potential” of the Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific. – Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies. No. 2. P. 157-185.

Kai He. 2018. Three faces of the Indo-Pacific: Understanding the “Indo-Pacific” from an IR Theory Perspective. – East Asia. Vol. 35. No. 2. P. 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-018-9286-5

Keling M.F., Som H.M., Saludin M.N., Shuib M.S., Na’iem Ajis M. 2011. The Development of ASEAN from Historical Approach. – Asian Social Science. Vol. 7. No. 7. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n7p169

Khurana G.S. 2007. Security of Sea Lines: Prospects for India-Japan Cooperation. – Strategic Analysis. Vol. 31. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160701355485

Lunev S., Shavlay E. 2018. Russia and India in the Indo-Pacific. – Asian Politics and Policy. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 713-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12430

Noland M. 2018. US Trade Policy in the Trump Administration. – Asian Economic Policy Review. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12226

Novikov D., Shumkova V. 2018. Mega-Regional Agreements and the Struggle for Economic Order in the Asia-Pacific Region. – Asian Economic Policy Review. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 791-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12429

Park S.C. 2017. RCEP versus TPP with the Trump Administration in the USA and Implications for East Asian Economic Cooperation. – Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 135-152. http://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050406

Roos R.S. 2018. On the fungibility of economic power: China’s economic rise and the East Asian Security. – European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 302-327. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354066118757854

Wignaraja G. 2014. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: An Initial Assessment. – The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Negotiation. P. 93-159.

Wilson J.D. 2014. Mega-Regional Trade Deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing between the TTP and RCEP? – Journal of Contemporary Asia. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 345-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2014.956138

Wuthnow J. 2017. Asian Security without the United States? Examinig China’s Security Strategy in Maritime and Continental Asia. – Asian Security. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 230-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1378181

Yilmaz S., Changming L. 2018. China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Strategy in Eurasia and Euro-Atlanticism. – Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 70. No. 2. P. 252-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1435777

Arapova E.Ya. 2016. Regionalizatsiya v Vostochnoi Azii v usloviyakh diversifikatsii istochnikov ekonomicheskogo rosta [Regionalization in East Asia under the Diversification of Sources of Economic Growth]. Moscow: Prospekt. 232 p. (In Russ.)

ASEAN. Novyi vitok integratsii i pozitsii Rossii. 2019. Doklad RSMD. Pod ruk. E. Kanaeva [ASEAN. A New Round of Integration and Russia’s Position. Report of the RIAC. Under the Leadership of E. Kanaev]. (In Russ.) URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/asean-russia (accessed 07.14.2020).

Baikov A.A. 2012. Sravnitel’naya integratsiya. Praktika i modeli zarubezhnoi integratsii v zarubezhnoi Evrope i tikhookeanskoi Azii [Comparative Integration. Practice and Models of Foreign Integration in Foreign Europe and Pacific Asia]. Moscow: Aspect Press. 256 p. (In Russ.)

Kheifets B. 2019. Novye ekonomicheskie megapartnerstva i Rossiya [New Economic Megapartnerships and Russia]. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia. 288 p. (In Russ.)

Koldunova E.V. 2014. Formirovanie novoi mezhdunarodno-politicheskoi situatsii v ATR [The Formation of a New International Political Situation in the Asia-Pacific Region]. – Tikhookeanskoe obozrenie 2012-2013. Pod red. N.P. Maletina, O.V. Novakovoi, V.V. Sumskogo [Pacific Review 2012-2013. Ed. by N.P. Maletin, O.V. Novakova, V.V. Sumskiy]. Moscow: International Relations Publ. P. 59-72. (In Russ.)

Kolosyuk N.A. 2003. The Reasons of the Asian Financial Crisis. – Oriental Institute Journal. No. 7. P. 42-47. (In Russ.)

Kostyunina G.M. 2014. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie ATR i regional’naya integratsiya [Asia-Pacific Economic Development and Regional Integration]. – Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskii region: regional’nye problemy, mnogostoronnie organizatsii i ekonomicheskie gruppirovki [Asia Pacific: Regional Issues, Multilateral Organizations, and Economic Groups]. Moscow: Vostok-Zapad. P. 239-256. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva M.M., Kuznetsov D.A. 2019. Transregional Integration as a New Phenomenon of World Politics: Nature and Prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 5. P. 71-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.05.06

Maletin N.P. 2007. ASEAN: chetyre desyatiletiya razvitiya [Asean: Four Decades of Development]. Moscow: MGIMO University. 312 p. (In Russ.)

Sevastyanov S.V. 2009. The “New Regionalism” of East Asia: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 4. P. 111-122. (In Russ.)

Streltsov D.V. 2018. Indo-Pacific Region as a New Reality of the Global System of International Relations. – The International Affairs. No. 9. P. 65-74. (In Russ.)

Content No. 5, 2020