NATO in the Сrosshairs of COVID-19
Antyukhova E.A.,
MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia, e.antyukhova@gmail.com
elibrary_id: 711990 | ORCID: 0000-0003-0860-4792 | RESEARCHER_ID: I-4189-2017
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.03.06
Antyukhova E.A. NATO in the Сrosshairs of COVID-19. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.03.06
The important influence biogenic threats have had on the context underlying the activities of leading international political actors is one of the most topical issues in current international political research. The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, which has engulfed the whole world, is one of the most serious challenges the international community is facing. The epidemic has put into question the effectiveness of the strategy of key international actors in these new realities, and has also become an important test for the organizational and functional capabilities of many international institutions. The article seeks to study the main activities and aspects thereof which, against the background of the pandemic, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has performed, as related to a set of measures undertaken by the leadership of the Alliance in the field of organization and information. Special attention is paid to analysing the impact emergencies caused by the pandemic have had on NATO’s strategic priorities in the sphere of political and military planning, as well as on the relations the organization may have had with other key international political actors – in particular, with such an important political player as the Russian Federation. The new challenges that arose in 2020 have become an important test of the effectiveness of different segments of the Alliance, as well as providing a profound challenge for the internal unity of the world’s largest military and political bloc. The problems framed at the beginning of the pandemic in the USA and some European states are, among other things, evidence of miscalculations in the operational planning system of what activities the Alliance can and should do in emergency situations. At the same time, the events related to the pandemic have had some influence on NATO leaders’ understanding of the priorities of its long-term strategy, contributing to the further development of the concept of the “global responsibility” of the Alliance. The analysis of the processes taking place within the NATO framework in recent months is, in our opinion, of fundamental significance both from the viewpoint of understanding the logic of current international political processes in general and from the viewpoint of assessing the dynamics of the development of relations between Russia and the key Western actors who are members of military and political associations.
References
After Covid-19: Australia, the Region and Multilateralism (Volume 2). 2020. Ed. by M. Shoebridge, Sharland L. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
Beckley P. 2020. Revitalizing NATO’s Once Robust Standardization Programme. Rome: NATO Defense College. URL: www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26019 (accessed 27.07.2020).
Berger C. 2020. Projecting Stability to the South: NATO’s Other Challenge. Rome: NATO Defense College. COVID-19: NATO in the Age of Pandemics. 2020. Ed. by T. Thierry. Rome: NATO Defense College. COVID-19 and World Order: The Future of Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation. 2020. Ed. by Hal Brands, Francis J. Gavin. Baltimore (MD): John Hopkins University Press.
De Maio G. 2020. NATO’s Response to COVID-19: Lessons for Resilience and Readiness. – Foreign Policy. October. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/FP_20201028_nato_covid_demaio-1.pdf (accessed 03.03.2021).
Ringsmose J., Webber M. 2020. No Time to Hedge? Articulating a European Pillar within the Alliance. Rome: NATO Defense College.
Rogg M. 2020. COVID-19: The Pandemic and Its Impact on Security Policy. – PRISM. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 54-67. The Alliance Five Years after Crimea: Implementing the Wales Summit Pledges. 2019. Ed. by M. Ozawa. Rome: NATO Defense College.
The Global Pandemic. Transatlantic Security and National Defence: Views from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and Norway. 2020. Ed. by R.J. Gullestad. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Defense Studies.
Baryshev A.P. 2011.Sovremennaya strategiya SShA i NATO v kontekste problem natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossii [The Modern Strategy of the United States and NATO in the Context of Russia’s National Security Problems]. Moscow: OGI Publ. (Ob’edinennoe Gumanitarnoe Izdatel’stvo). (In Russ.)
Shumilin A.I. 2020. Pandemic Factor in European Foreign Policy. – Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the Institute of Europe RAS. No. 2. P. 14-21. (In Russ.)
Usubov F.D.O., Belonogov A.L. 2010. Problems of Transformation of NATO Strategy at the Beginning of the 21st Century. – Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 6: Political Science. International Relations. Issue 1. P. 93-100. (In Russ.)
See also:
Chugrov S.V.,
Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics: 5 years on track. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No5
Kravchuk A.A.,
Neo-Realistic Approach to Analysis of Military-Political Situation in the Arctic. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No1
Alekseyeva T.A.,
Reflections on modern world politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3
Arbatova N.K.,
EU Security: Micro-Aggression with Macro-Consequences. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5
Peskov D.N.,
World Politics, or Running on the Spot. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No1