.jpg)
printPolitical realism between American republicanism and German elitism
Stoianov R.R.,
Independent researcher, Moscow, Russia, stoyanov.r00@mail.ru
ORCID: 0009-0000-1002-2770 |Article received: 2023.10.02 17:59. Accepted: 2024.04.22 18:00
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.04.12
EDN: SHKFNH
For citation:
Stoianov R.R. Political realism between American republicanism and German elitism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 4. P. 166-179. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.04.12. EDN: SHKFNH
Abstract
The focus of this study is a discussion between the representative of classical realism, H. Morgenthau, and the American theorists of republicanism, J. Calhoun and W. Sumner. The author argues that Morgenthau was proving the limitations of republican political theory. For this purpose, Morgenthau developed the concept of political power of the German theory of elitism. The content of the study is divided into three parts. First, the term “power” is analyzed in the political writings of representatives of German elitism of the Weimar Republic K. Schmitt, O. Spengler and E. Jünger. Next, the role of the concepts of “self-government” and “commonwealth” in Calhoun and Sumner’s theory is explored. Finally, the author shows how Morgenthau engages the notion of “power” against the conceptual foundations of republican theory. The methodology of the study is based on the principles of analyzing political texts formulated by representatives of the Cambridge School of the History of Ideas. This methodology allows us to focus on the theorist’s motivation to solve a political problem with the help of a set of concepts that are relevant to the current debate. The main conclusion of the study is that Morgenthau, in a polemic with republican theorists, constructed an image of the American empire of the Western Hemisphere, giving full authority to the central government and relegating the key republican principle of federalism to a way of decentralizing power at the regional level. Morgenthau’s victory in the debates with republican theorists also allows us to conclude that the establishment of the ideas of realism in the American science of international relations contributed to the transformation of the United States from a republic into a new centralized empire.
Keywords
nation-state, empire, power, self-government, commonwealth.
References
Bew, J. (2016). Realpolitik: a history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blachford, K. (2019). Republicanism within IR: a history of liberty and empire. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 48(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829819872807
Calhoun, J.C. (1992). A discourse on the Constitution and government of the United States. In R.S. Lence (Ed.), Union and Liberty: The Political Philosophy of John C. Calhoun (pp. 79-284). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Calhoun, J.C. (1999). Speech on the war with Mexico (revised version). In C.N. Wilson, & S.B. Cook (Ed.), The Papers of John C. Calhoun, vol. 25 (pp. 75-95). Hampton: University of South Carolina Press.
Dias, F.S. (2020). From Realpolitik to realism: the American reception of German conception of politics. History of European Ideas, 46(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2020.1738772
Gilpin, R.G. (1996). No one loves a political realist. Security Studies, 5(3), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419608429275
Gismondi, M. (2004). Tragedy, realism, and postmodernity: Kulturpessimismus in the theories of Max Weber, E.H. Carr, Hans J. Morgenthau, and Henry Kissinger. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 15(3), 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290490498839
Guardino, P. (2017). The dead march: a history of the Mexican-American war. London: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674981836
Guilhot, N. (2017). After the Enlightenment: political realism and international relations in the mid-twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316755181
Joynt, C.B., & Hayden, S.S. (1955). Morals and politics: the current debate. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 21(3), 354-362. https://doi.org/10.2307/138205
Jünger, E. (2002). Der Arbeiter – Herrschaft und Gestalt. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Jünger, E. (2013a). Revolution und Idee (23/24 September 1923). In S.O. Berggötz (Ed.), Politische Publizistik 1919-1933 (pp. 33-37). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Jünger, E. (2013b). Der neue Nationalismus (23/24 Januar 1927). In S.O. Berggötz (Ed.), Politische Publizistik 1919-1933 (pp. 285-291). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Kehr, E. (1977). Economic interest, militarism and foreign policy: essays on German history. Berkley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520351196
Kelly, D. (2017). August Ludwig von Rochau and Realpolitik as historical political theory. Global Intellectual History, 3(1), 1-30. Https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2017.1387331
Koselleck, R., Brunner, O., & Conze, W. (Ed.). (2004). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland (Bd. 3). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Kvistad, G.O. (1999). The rise and demise of German statism: loyalty and political membership. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv287sdsv
Lewis, B. (2022). Oswald Spengler and the politics of decline. New York: Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781800735743
Magalhães, P.T. (2021). The legitimacy of modern democracy: a study on the political thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315157566
Meibauer, G., Desmaele, L., Onea, T., Kitchen, N., Foulon, M., Reichwein, A., & Sterling-Folker, J. (2021). Forum: rethinking neoclassical realism at theory’s end. International Studies Review, 23(1), 268-295. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa018
Mirowski, P. (2011). Realism and neoliberalism: from reactionary modernism to postwar conservatism. In N. Guilhot (Ed.), The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory (pp. 210-238). New York: Columbia University Press.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1948). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1950). The mainsprings of American foreign policy: the national interest vs moral abstractions. The American Political Science Review, 44(4), 833-854. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951286
Morgenthau, H.J. (1952). Another “great debate”: the national interest of the United States. The American Political Science Review, 46(4), 961-988. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108
Nester, W. (2013). The age of Jackson and the art of American power, 1815-1848. Washington: Potomac Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ddr80h
Pocock, J.G.A. (1985). Virtue, commerce and history: essays on political thought and history, chiefly in the eighteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720505
Schmitt C. (2015). Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlin: Dunkler & Humblot. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720505
Schmitt, C. (1932). Der Begriff des Politischen. Mit einer Rede über Zeitalter der Neutralisierungen und Entpolitisierungen: neu herausgegeben. München Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.
Schweller, R.L. (2009). Neoclassical realism and state mobilization: expansionist ideology in the age of mass politics. In E. Lobell, N.M. Ripsman, & J. W. Taliaferro (Ed.), Neoclassical Realism, the State and Foreign Policy (pp. 227-250). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811869.008 Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171274
Slaughter, S. (2018). Republicanism and international political theory. In C. Brown, & R. Eckersley (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory (pp. 626-638). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.001.0001
Specter, M. (2022). The Atlantic realists: empire and international political thought between Germany and the United States. Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503629974
Spengler, O. (1920). Preußentum und Sozialismus. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Spengler, O. (2016). Nietzsche und sein Jahrhundert: Rede, gehalten am 15. Oktober 1924, dem 80. Geburtstage Nitzsches, im Nietzche Archive zu Weimar. In Reden und Aufsätze (pp. 98-110). Berlin: Berliner Ausgabe.
Struve, W. (1973). Elites against democracy: leadership ideals in bourgeois political thought in Germany, 1890-1933. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sumner, W.G. (1911a). The conquest of the United States by Spain. In A.G. Keller (Ed.), War and Other Essays (pp. 297-336). New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Sumner, W.G. (1911b). The fallacy of territorial extension. In A.G. Keller (Ed.), War and Other Essays (pp. 285-296). New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Tannenbaum, F. (1952). The balance of power versus the coördinate state. Political Science Quarterly, 67(2), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2145721
Tjalve, V.S. (2008). Realist strategies of republican peace: Niebuhr, Morghentau, and the politics of patriotic dissent. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611191
Williams, M.C. (2005). The realist tradition and the limits of international relations. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491771
Woods, R. (1996). The conservative revolution in the Weimar Republic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375857
Graham, T. (2023). Russia and the United States on the world stage. Part III. The role of messianism, exceptionalism, ambition, and survival in forging rivalry. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 50-66. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.03.05
Naumkin, V.V. (2020). Non-West model. does the civilization-state exist? Polis. Political Studies, 4, 78-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.06
Pabst, A. (2021). Civilization and liberal democracy. Polis. Political Studies, 4, 26-42. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.04.04
Content No. 4, 2024
See also:
Mommen A.,
Federalism and the National State (To the History of the Problem) .... – Polis. Political Studies. 1992. No4
Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Tolstykh V.I., Mezhuyev V.M., Guseynov A.A., Boroday Yu.M., Kazin A.L.,
National state: theory, history, political practice (Foreword ТоIstуkh V.I. Moments of discussion: Mezhuyev V.M., Guseупоv A.A., Воrоdау Yu .М., Кazin A.L. ). – Polis. Political Studies. 1992. No6
Kochetkov A.P.,
National state in the conditions of globalization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No4
Timofeyeva L.N.,
Russian Government and Bureaucratic State by V.P. Makarenko. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No3
Neklessa A.I.,
Ongoing plebiscite. Genetics of civil society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2
.jpg)
.jpg)
