print

Social and political development:
out of conceptual mazes and into political agenda-setting

Semenenko I.S.,

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, semenenko@imemo.ru

elibrary_id: 251670 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2529-9283 |

Khaynatskaya T.I.,

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, tatianakh@imemo.ru

elibrary_id: 1108737 | ORCID: 0000-0002-6364-4765 |

Article received: 2024.07.11 14:59. Accepted: 2024.08.05 14:59


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.06.05
EDN: ETDYLO

Rubric: Political discourse

For citation:

Semenenko I.S., Khaynatskaya T.I. Social and political development: out of conceptual mazes and into political agenda-setting. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.06.05. EDN: ETDYLO (In Russ.)

Abstract

The article presents the results of the analysis and systematization of discourses describing the dynamics and key areas of social development. The purpose of the study is to determine the guidelines and priorities in discussions on development that dominate the research and expert agenda, and to identify the ideas and meanings that are invested in this concept by actors participating in public discussions and political goal-setting. The research methodology is based on the structural and functional approach, and on a comparative evaluation of the target settings present in the current expert discussion and in public policymaking. A quantitative content analysis of a sample of EU documents defining priorities of interaction with third countries to achieve development goals is offered as an illustrative example. The conclusions are presented in the form of a conceptual tree constructed by correlating the main concepts that exist in the research and expert field dealing with social development discourses and their political implications. According to the results of the study, the ideological appeal of narratives circulating in the public space of the “developed world” and the normative projection of this agenda worldwide transform discursive power into discursive hegemony through “green colonialism” and other forms of “promoting development”. The authors take a critical approach to the monopolization of the expert and political field by the concept of “sustainable development” which is widely regarded as a politically correct approach and a universalist political attitude. An ambiguous understanding of “social development” beyond the progressive paradigm and purely normative approaches in the social sciences makes the need to clarify this concept all the more urgent. The paper proposes to interpret “political development” as a multidimensional process leading to the complication of political interactions and not limited to institutional change, and “politics of development” as a system of management practices correlated with the public demand for security and social well-being. The current research agenda in this field in Russia aims to promote the analysis of the subjective dimension of politics, with a focus on identity studies and on evaluating intangible development resources.

Keywords

societal development, political development, development discourses, discursive power, sustainable development, green growth, welfare state, wellbeing economy, politics of development, development identity, narratives on development, responsible development.

 Alles, D., & Badie, B. (2016). Sovereigntism in the international system: from change to split. European Review of /nternational Studies, 3(2), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.3224/eris.v3i2.02.hal-03393510

Barbier, E. (2016). Is green growth relevant for poor economies? Resource and Energy Economics, 45(C), 178-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.05.001

Bates, R.H. (2018). Political Development. In C. Lancaster, N. van de Valle (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Politics of Development (pp. 64-72). New York: Oxford University Press.

Batty, S. (2006). Paradoxes of sustainable development: property and participation. Property Management, 24(3), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470610660110

Becker, U. (2023). The social eco-state. Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy Research Paper, 2023-1.

Bieber, F. (2020). Debating nationalism: the global spread of nations. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350098558

Borowy, I., & Schmelzer, M. (Ed.) (2017). History of the future of economic growth. Historical roots of current debates on sustainable degrowth. New York: Routledge.

Claar, S. (2022). Green colonialism in the European Green Deal: continuities of dependency and the relationship of forces between Europe and Africa. Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 7(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2022-2-262

Dale, G., Mathai, M.V., & Puppim de Oliveira, J.A. (Ed.). (2016). Green growth: ideology, political economy and the alternatives. London: Zed Books Ltd.

Eisenstadt, S.N. (1964). Breakdowns of modernization. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 12(4), 345-367.

Eisenstadt, S.N. (1973). Tradition, change, and modernity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Engebretsen, E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2024). Why are the sustainable development goals failing? Overcoming the paradox of unimplementability. The Lancet Global Health, 12(7), e1084-e1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00179-7

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Estrada, E. (2023). What is a complex system, after all? Foundations of Science, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-023-09917-w

Fioramonti, L. (2024). Post-growth theories in a global world: a comparative analysis. Review of International Studies, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210524000214

Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay: from the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Garcia-Garcia, P., Buendia, L., & Carpintero, 0. (2022). Welfare regimes as enablers of just energy transitions: revisiting and testing the hypothesis of synergy for Europe. Ecological Economics, 197(C), 107434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107434

Geisinger, A. (1999). Sustainable development and the domination of nature: spreading the seed of the western ideology of nature. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 27, 43-73.

Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: the renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Han, B.-C. (2016). Mudigkeitsgeselischaft Burnoutgesellschaft Hoch-Zeit. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz Berlin Verlag.

Haq, U.M. (1995). Reflections on human development. New York. Oxford University Press.

Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964

Huntington, S. (1965). Political development and political decay. World Politics, 17(3), 386-430. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009286

Huntington, S. (1991). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman; London: University of Oklahoma Press.

Inglehart, R. (1988). Cultural change in advanced industrial societies: postmaterialist values and their consequences. International Review of Sociology, 2(3), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.1988.9971376

Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan; Routledge.

Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941

Kautsky, J.H. (1962). Political change in underdeveloped countries: nationalism and communism. New York; London: John Wiley and Sons.

Khanna, P. (2008). The Second World. Empires and Influence in the New Global Order. New York: Random House.

Knobl, W. (2017). The sociologial discourse on “modernization” and “modernity”. Revue international de philosophie, 281(3), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.281.0311

Lancaster, C., & van de Valle, N. (Ed.). (2018) The oxford handbook of the politics of development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Meadowcroft, J. (2005). From welfare state to ecostate. In J. Barry, & R. Eckersley (Ed.), /he State and the Global Ecological Crisis (pp. 3-25). Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6439.003.0003

Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press.

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Roberts, L., & Henderson, J. (2020). Degrowth, green growth, a-growth and post-growth: the debate on ways forward from our growth addiction. Land Environment and People Research Report. No. 57. Lincolm; Canterbury, New Zealand: Lincoln University.

Rustow, D.A. (1970). Transitions to democracy: toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337-363. https://doi.org/10.2307/421307

Schmidt, V.A. (2002). Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002002

Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014

Sen, A., Stiglitz, J., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives: why GDP doesn’t add up? The New Press. http://www.tinyurl.com/y63bg5dj

Trainer, T. (2011). The radical implications of a zero-growth economy. Real-World Economics Review, 57(1), 71-82.

Vazquez, K.C., Reis, C., Romero, J.P., Cimini, F., Ramos, L., & Alvarenga, M. (2022). Cinco missoes para o desenvolvimento transformador do Brasil. Revista /empo do Mundo, 29, 207-270. https://doi.org/10.38116/rtm29art7

Wodak, R.E. (2018). Discourses About Nationalism. In J. Flowerdew, & J.E. Richardson (Ed.), /he Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 403-420). London: Routledge.

Bardin, A.L., & Sigachev, M.I. (2019). Discourses of development: social and humanitarian aspects. Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal, 4, 24-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2019-4-24-41

Bobylev, S. N. (2017). Sustainable development: paradigm for the future. World Economy and International Relations, 61(3),107-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-3-107-113

Borokh, O.N., & Lomanov, АЛ< (2024). Chinese-style modernization: evolution of the concept. World Economy and International Relations, 68(1), 31-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-1-31-47

Fadeeva, L.A. (2023). Permanentnyi krizis [Permanent crisis]. In I.S. Semenenko (Ed.), Identichnost': lichnost', obshchestvo, politika. Novye kontury issledovatel'skogo polya [Identity: /he Individual, Society and Politics. New Contours of the Researched Field] (pp. 371-377). Moscow: Ves’ Mir. (In Russ.)

Fedotova, V.G. (2005). Khoroshee obshchestvo. [The good society]. Moscow: Progress Publishers. (In Russ.)

Kapustin, B. G. (1998). Sovremennost' kak predmet politicheskoi teorii [Modernity as a subject of political theory]. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia Publishers (ROSSPEN). (In Russ.)

Kapustin, B.G. (2001). The end of “transitology”? (reflecting on the first post-communist decade as subject of theoretical interpretation). Polis. Political Studies, 4, 6-26. (In Russ.)

Kapustin, B.G. (2024). On the metaphor “revolutions are the locomotives of history”. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 50-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.05

Karl, T.L., & Shmitter, Ph. (2004). Concepts, assumptions and hypotheses about democratization (reflections on applicability of the transitological paradigm for the study of post-communist transformations). Polis. Political Studies, 4, 78-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.04.02

Lapkin, V.V. (2017). Socio-political contexts of identity transformations in the 21^st century. In Semenenko, I.S. (Ed.), Identichnost: Lichnost, Obshchestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie [Identity: The Individual, Society and Politics. An Encyclopedia] (pp. 88-101). Moscow: Ves' Mir. (In Russ.)

Lapkin, V.V. (2018). Nation vs empire in the modern world order. Polis. Political Studies, 4, 37-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.04.04

Lapkin, V.V. (2021). Cleavages in territorial communities, internal consolidation of national states, and new challenges of extraterritoriality. South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 22(2), 6-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-22-2-6-20

Lapkin, V.V. (2023). Territorial state and complex society: the imperative of co-evolution in the space of politics. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 172-191. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.05.11

Lomanov, A.V. (2023). Adaptatsiya Kitaya k novoy real'nosti [China adapting to new realities]. In V.V. Mikheyev, A.V. Lomanov, & V.G. Shvydko (Ed.), Novaya real'nost' indo-tikhookeanskogo prostranstva [New Reality in IndoPacific] (pp. 17-30). Moscow: IMEMO RAS. https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0567-3. (In Russ.)

Lunkin, R.N. (2023). Identizm: poiski novoj ideologii. In I.S. Semenenko (Ed.), Identichnost‘: lichnost‘, obshchestvo, politika. Novye kontury issledovatel'skogo polya [Identity: The Individual, Society and Politics. New Contours of the Researched Field] (pp. 242-249). Moscow: Ves' Mir. (In Russ.)

Naumkin, V.V. (2020). Non-West model: does the civilization-state exist? Polis. Political Studies, 4, 78-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.06

Pantin, V., & Sigachev, M. (2024). Socio-political development of modern societies: concepts, practices, problems (examples from Latin American countries, the EU, and Russia). Perm University Herald. Political Science, 18(2), 5-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-2-5-14

Romanova, T.A. (2011). The normative power of the European Union and its conflictual perception in Russia as a barrier for the EU-Russian legal and political approximation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations. 1, 52-66. (In Russ.)

Sadovaya, E.S., Tsapenko, I.P. Grishin, I.V. (Ed.). (2020). Sotsial'noe gosudarstvo v zerkale obshchestvennykh transformatsii [The welfare state in the mirror of social transformations]. Moscow: IMEMO RAS. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0584-0.

Semenenko, I.S. (2019). Horizons of responsible development: from discourse to governance. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 7-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02

Semenenko, I.S., & Khaynatskaya, T.I. (2022). Well-being discourses in an environment of “unsustainable development”: bridging the past and the future. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 5, 76-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869049922050045

Semenenko, I.S., Lapkin, V.V., & Pantin, V.I. (2021). Social cleavages and political divides in a theoretical perspective: criteria for assessment and classification. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 56-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.05.

Semenenko, I.S. (Ed.). (2023). Identichnost‘: lichnost‘, obshchestvo, politika. Novye kontury issledovatel'skogo polya [Identity: the individual, society and politics. New contours of the researched field]. Moscow: Ves' Mir. (In Russ.) https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/publ/2023/Identichnost-Semenenko-2023.pdf

Semenenko, I.S. Lapkin, V.V. & Pantin, V.I. (Ed.). (2020). Gosudarstvo v politicheskoi nauke i sotsial'noi real'nosti XXI veka [The state in political science: transformations in a twenty-first century social context]. Moscow: Ves' Mir. (In Russ.)

Tishkov, A.V., & Filippova, E.I. (Ed.). (2016). Kul'turnaya slozhnost' sovremennykh natsii [The cultural complexity of modern nations]. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia Publishers (ROSSPEN). (In Russ.)

See also: