Geographical Ideas of the Parties in the Process of Settling Ethno-Political Conflicts in the Commonwealth of Independent States
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.02.07
Rasskazov S.V. Geographical Ideas of the Parties in the Process of Settling Ethno-Political Conflicts in the Commonwealth of Independent States . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.02.07
The article presents a review of geographical ideas of those engaged in major ethno-political conflicts on the post-Soviet expanse: the Transdniestrian, the Abkhazian, the South-Ossetic, the Karabakh and the Tajik ones. On distinguishing the “European” group of conflicts, the author demonstrates that most of them are underlain not so much by ethnic, as by center/peripheral contradictions determined by a combination of socio- and politico-cultural, economic, religious and other factors. The only exception is the Karabakh conflict in which the struggle between the center and a region (Azerbaijan and Nagorny Karabakh) occasions participation of another center ethnically similar to the latter (i.e. of Armenia). Specificity of the only “non-European” conflict (the Tajik one) the author relates to its regional-clannish character.
See also:
Shevchenko A.Yu.,
Discourse-Analysis of Political Media-Texts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6
Teterin A.Ye.,
Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5
Trakhtenberg A.D.,
Discourse-Analysis of Mass Communication and Paradoxes of Leftist Consciousness. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No4
Klemeshev A.P., Ilyin M.V.,
Lost in Translation. Being the Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5
Kuchinov A.M.,
Approaches and Methods for Survey of Texts and Discourse in Political Science: Classification Experience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5