Decentralization, Democratization, and Efficiency (Reform of Federative Relations and of Local Self-Government in the Light of the Theory of Efficient Decentralization)

Decentralization, Democratization, and Efficiency (Reform of Federative Relations and of Local Self-Government in the Light of the Theory of Efficient Decentralization)


Nechayev V.D.,

Dr. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Professor, Rector, Sevastopol State University
elibrary_id: 199724 |



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.03.08

For citation:

Nechayev V.D. Decentralization, Democratization, and Efficiency (Reform of Federative Relations and of Local Self-Government in the Light of the Theory of Efficient Decentralization) . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.03.08



Abstract

It has been attempted in the article to appraise the extent of validity of the thesis of efficiency of government decentralization. On analyzing the decentralization supporters’ arguments, the author demonstrates that if the strategy in question ever justifies the hopes being placed in it, it justifies them only in case there have been formed systems of democratic control in regional and local communities and the interaction between power levels is proceeding in the regime of cooperation. In case these conditions are lacking, decentralization is conducive not so much to increasing, as to decreasing efficiency of the public sector. However, counter-strategy, i.e. centralization, while relieving in the short-term perspective the negative consequences of an unprepared decentralization, at the same time, by the author’s conclusion, impedes development of practice apt to provide realization of the latent potential of a system under which governing functions are handed over to the local and regional levels.


Content No. 3, 2005

See also:


Peregudov S.P.,
Transnational Corporations on the Way to Corporate Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3

Fyodorov K.G.,
The Policy in the Sphere of Local Taxation in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Peregudov S.P.,
Corporate Capital and Power Institutions: Who Plays the Master?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

Kazantzev A.A.,
Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Sergeev V.M.,
How Are Social Changes Possible? (Prolegomena to a Statistical Theory of Social Networks). – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991