Caspian Antinomies

Caspian Antinomies




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.06.09

For citation:

Chernyavsky Ye.B. Caspian Antinomies . – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2006.06.09



Abstract

Not only lands, but also water expanses were divided between the states that were formed on the territory of the USSR after its disintegration. But if at the Baltic Sea, at the Sea of Azov and at the Black Sea, as well as at the Lakes Chudskoye and Pskovskoye the division of waters went off relatively painlessly, then the question of water boundaries at the Caspian Sea even now still arouses heated disputes. The article seeks to substantiate the thesis that these disputes are due to the Caspian Sea’s especial status established by bilateral agreements of Persia (Iran) and the RSFSR (the USSR). On analyzing these agreements in detail, the author reveals in them a whole number of ambiguities and contradictions, whose sources he sees in the Soviet authorities’ ideological miscalculations. He finds miscalculations of an analogous kind also in the policies of today’s Russian leadership. What prevents Russia from seeing the new by-Caspian states as subjects of international relations, equivalent to herself, is, according to his conclusion, the idea of her own mission in the post-Soviet space, idea which makes her to sacrifice her national interests for the sake of a delusive hope for gaining the devotion of the leaders of the former Union republics and for keeping within the sphere of her influence the lands of the empire that crashed down in 1917.


Content No. 6, 2006

See also:


Peregudov S.P.,
Transnational Corporations on the Way to Corporate Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3

Fyodorov K.G.,
The Policy in the Sphere of Local Taxation in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Peregudov S.P.,
Corporate Capital and Power Institutions: Who Plays the Master?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

Kazantzev A.A.,
Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Sergeev V.M.,
How Are Social Changes Possible? (Prolegomena to a Statistical Theory of Social Networks). – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2009


Mitrofanova A.V.
Labyrinths and Enigmas of Theocracy

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991