“Soft Power”: Arrangement of Senses, Russian Style

“Soft Power”:
Arrangement of Senses, Russian Style


Andreyev A.L.,

Dr. Sci (Philos.), Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia; Professor, VGIK, Moscow, Russia; Professor, National Research University MPEI, Moscow, Russia, sympathy_06@mail.ru


elibrary_id: 72609 | ORCID: 0000-0003-1692-573X | RESEARCHER_ID: AAT-3789-2020


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.05.10
Rubric: Laboratory

For citation:

Andreyev A.L. “Soft Power”: Arrangement of Senses, Russian Style. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.05.10



Abstract

The article considers the controversial question of the applicability of the concept of “soft power” in respect to contemporary Russia and its foreign policy. Under this angle of view, the author undertakes logical and methodological analysis of the concept. Such an analysis is necessary for its transformation from a metaphorical concept into an operational analytical term. There are some semantic constraints in the current use of this concept, so the author suggests it’s wider interpretation, which allows introducing some important factors of political influence that are usually not taken into account in publications devoted to the analysis of “soft” impacts. The author emphasizes the need to investigate “reverse effects” of political and ideological influence that can be stretched with changing their modality. The author argues that soft power is built in the form of a certain contextually determined structure with a variable configuration. The key element of this structure, defining its unique profile and internal coherence, is the ability to “establish the meaning”. From this perspective, the article considers the question of the presence / absence of “soft power” in Russian politics. The author answers in the broad context opening alternative options of socio-historical development. In this connection, the author dwells on the prospects of the so-called post-human civilization actively discussed in some expert circles, but also on the dehumanizing tendencies inherent in the latest political technologies. The article supposes that Russia now stands objectively as a factor keeping the history on “human path.”

Keywords
Russia; soft power; values; image of Russia; post-human civilization; political manipulation; technologies; historical project.


Content No. 5, 2016

See also:


Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Medoeva Z.G., Vasilenko I.A., Malysheva E.M., Hawer-Tukarkina O.M., Chugrov S.V.,
The image of Russia: deficit of «soft power»?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No4

Chugrov S.V.,
Sof Attraction of Japan. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No6

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Streltsov D.V., Chugrov S.V., Karelova L.B., Oznobishchev S.K.,
Russia and Japan. Part II. View from Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1

Pavlova E.B., Romanova T.A.,
Normative Power: Some Theory Aspects and Contemporary Practice of Russia and the EU. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No1

Pishcheva T.N., Vinogradova N.S., Nedova A.D.,
The image of Russia through prisms of political communications. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4

 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991