print

In Search of the Origins of Multinational Federalism

Mochalov A.N.,

Ural State Law University, Yekaterinburg, Russia, artur.mochalov@usla.ru

elibrary_id: 530388 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2502-559X | RESEARCHER_ID: S-3195-2016

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.01.07

Rubric: Russia Today

For citation:

Mochalov A.N. In Search of the Origins of Multinational Federalism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.01.07

The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No. 19-011-00697. The author is grateful for the informative recommendations to Professor A.-G. Gagnon (Montreal, Canada), Professor F. Palermo (Bolzano, Italy), Professor B. Arore (New Delhi, India), Professor K.K. Suan Hausing (Hyderabad, India) and Professor N. Steitler (Cape Town, South Africa).

Abstract

In the article, the author’s approach to multinational federalism through its political and legal understanding of is presented. The author’s considerations are built on a broad set of studies by Russian and foreign scholars as well as theorists of democracy on nationalism and ethnic identity. As a result, the author concludes that multinational federalism is not an anomaly but an outcome of the development of a conception of the nation-state. As a response to the challenges of regional ethnic nationalism, multinational federalism creates an institutional framework which provides limited statehood for a region where a minority ethnic group is concentrated. At the same time, such a region remains within a federal state as its sub-national entity. As a result, individuals belonging to this ethnic group obtain more opportunities in realization of cultural rights and democratic participation in decision-making processes, especially at the regional level. In a discourse of nationalism, a sub-federal entity with a dominant separate ethnic group can be regarded as a semblance of nation-state; its population with its own cultural distinctions can be described in terms of “internal nation”. The author states that multinationalism (or pluri-nationalism) is a non-classic mode of statehood. In contrast to a nation-state, this means that national identity is not static, but can change over time and can be multitudinous. From this point of view, a state is not the same as a nation and can compress several “internal” nations. Multinational federalism creates a framework for multiple citizenship and a plural civil and national identity. The author also believes that Russian federalism should be rethought in the light of abovementioned considerations. In the growing understanding of federal arrangements, attention must be paid to their democratic potential. 

Keywords

multinational federalism, pluri-national federalism, ethnic federalism, ethnicity, identity, nationalism, nation-state, nation, state territory, democracy, minorities, discourse.

 Full Text

Anderson L. 2016. Ethnofederalism and the Management of Ethnic Conflict: Assessing the Alternatives. – Publius. The Journal of Federalism. Vol. 46. No. 1. P. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjv019

Barrington L.W. 1997. “Nation” and “Nationalism”. The Misuse of Key Concepts in Political Science. – Political Science and Politics. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 712-716. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjv019

Burgess M. 2012. Multinational Federalism in Multinational Federation. – Multinational Federalism. Problems and Prospects. Ed. by M. Seymour, A.-G. Gagnon. London, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016744_2

Connor W. 1994. Ethnonationalism. The Quest for Understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 234 p.

Dahl R. 1983. Federalism and the Democratic Process. – Nomos. Vol. 25. P. 95-108.

Erk J., Anderson L. 2009. The Paradox of Federalism: Does Self-Rule Accommodate or Exacerbate Ethnic Divisions? – Regional & Federal Studies. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560902753388

Ethnicity: Theory and Experience. 1975. Ed. by N. Glazer, D.P. Moynihan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 531 p.

Gagnon A.-G. 2014. Minority Nations in the Age of Uncertainty. New Paths to National Emancipation and Empowerment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 176 p. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442621251

Hechter M. 2001. Containing Nationalism. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 256 p.

Horowitz D. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkley: University of California Press. 698 p.

Keating M. 2001. Plurinational Democracy. Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 198 p.

Kincaid J. 2011. Editor’s Introduction: Federalism as a Mode of Governance. – Federalism. Vol. 1. Historical and Theoretical Foundations of Federalism. Ed. by J. Kincaid. L.: Sage Publ. P. xxi-xxxv. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446261620

Kymlicka W. 2001. Minority Nationalism and Multinational Federalism. – Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 91-119. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199240981.003.0006

McGarry J., O’Leary B. 2007. Federations and Managing Nations. – Multinational Federations. Ed. by M. Burgess, J. Pinder. L., N.Y.: Routledge. P. 180-211.

Moore M. 2004. Sub-State Nationalism and International Law. – Michigan Journal of International Law. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 1319-1340.

Murphy A.B. 1989. Territorial Policies in Multiethnic States. – Geographical Review. Vol. 79. No. 4. P. 410-421. https://doi.org/10.2307/215115

Watts R. 2007. Multinational Federations in Comparative Perspective. – Multinational Federations. Ed. by M. Burgess, J. Pinder. L., N.Y.: Routledge. P. 225-247. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964514

Abdulatipov R.G., Mikhailov V.A. 2014. Federal Democracy and the Multinational Country Unity. – Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. No. 3. P. 7-18. (In Russ.)

Altermatt U. 2000. Das Fanal von Sarajevo. Ethnonationalismus in Europa (Russ. ed.: Altermatt U. Etnonatsionalizm v Evrope. Moscow: Russian State University of Humanities. 367 p.).

Anderson B. 2016. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Russ. ed.: Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole. 416 p.).

Avksent’ev V., Vasil’chenko V. 2013. The Impasses of Ethnic Federalism. – Observer. No. 10. P. 6-15. (In Russ.)

Boltenkova L.F. Ryabova E.I. 2016. Federalism as a Guarantee of Stability of the Russian Nationhood. – Etnosotsium i mezhnatsional’naya kul’tura. No. 5. P. 90-104. (In Russ.)

Brubaker R. 2012. Ethnicity without Groups (Russ. ed.: Brabaker R. Etnichnost’ bez grupp. Moscow: HSE Publ. 408 p.).

Chirkin V.E. 2019. Territorial Organization of Public Governance. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M. 208 p. (In Russ.)

Drobizheva L.M. 2001. Ethnicity in the Modern Society. Ethnic Policy and Social practices in the Russian Federation. – Mir Rossii. No. 2. P. 167-180. (In Russ.)

Farukshin M.Kh. 2017. Institutional Foundations of Ethnic Federations. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 103-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.02.07

Filippov V.R. 2003. Kritika etnicheskogo federalizma [Critics of Ethnic Federalism]. Moscow: Centre for Civilisational and Regional Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 379 p. (In Russ.)

Gellner E. 1991. Nations and nationalism (Russ. ed.: Gellner E. Natsii i natsionalizm. Moscow: Progress. 319 p.).

Hobsbawm E. 1998. Nations and Nationalism since 1780 (Russ. ed.: Hobsbawm E. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 goda. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia. 306 p.).

Khabrieva T.Ya. 2010. Sovremennye problemy samoopredeleniya etnosov. Sravnitel’no-pravovoe issledovanie [The Modern Problems of Ethnic Self-Determination. A Comparative-Law Study]. Moscow: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law. 288 p. (In Russ.)

Malakhov V.S. 2011. National State, National Culture and Cultural Sovereignty. – Voprosy filosofii. No. 9. P. 87-94. (In Russ.)

Mart’yanov V.S. 2011. The Rhetoric on Identity in the Conditions of Modern: Who Benefits from It? – Sotsium i vlast’. No. 4. P. 61-65. (In Russ.)

Palermo F. 2017. Territories, Ownership, Minorities: Back to Basics and the Way Forward. – Russian Juridical Journal. No. 6. P. 49-69. (In Russ.)

Pushkareva G.V. 2017. Ideas and Values as a Method of Constructing Symbolic Space of the National Identity. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 5. P. 156-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.05.11

Semenenko I.S. 2013. Social and Cultural Modernization and a Conflict of Identities. – The “Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya” Yearbook. Vol. 12. P. 111-131. (In Russ.)

Semenenko I.S. 2015. Nations, Nationalism, National Identity: New Dimensions in Academic Discourse. – World Economy and International Relations. No. 11. P. 91-102. (In Russ.)

Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I. 2010. Identity in the System of Coordinates of World Development. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 40-59. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.politstudies.ru/article/4278 (accessed 05.12.2020).

Starostina I.A. 2016. Political and Legal Issues of Ethnic Federalism in the Way of Formation of the Russia’s National Development Strategy: Constitutional and Legal Aspects. – Constitutional and Municipal Law. No. 11. P. 47-49. (In Russ.)

Tishkov V.A. 2003. Rekviem po etnosu: issledovaniya po sotsial’no-kul’turnoi antropologii [Requiem for an Ethnos: The Social and Cultural Anthropology Studies]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 544 p. (In Russ.)

Tishkov V.A. 2009. National Identity (on the Sense of the Debates). – Vestnik rossiiskoi natsii. No. 1. P. 33-43. (In Russ.)

Tishkov V.A. 2016. From Ethnos to Ethnicity and After. – Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. No. 5. P. 5-22. (In Russ.)

Yack B. 2017. Nationalism and the Moral Psychology of Community (Russ. ed.: Yack B. Natsionalizm i moral’naya psikhologiya obshchestva. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara. 520 p.).

Yan E. 2000. State and Ethnic Understanding of Nation: Contradictions and Similarities. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 1. P. 114-123. (In Russ.) 

See also: