Russia and the Korean Peninsula:
Political Realism and Empathy
Lukin A.L.,
Oriental Institute – School of Regional and International Science, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia, artlukin@mail.ru
elibrary_id: 206813 |
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.03.12
Lukin A.L. Russia and the Korean Peninsula: Political Realism and Empathy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.03.12
The political developments on the Korean Peninsula, which is situated, in fact, at the heart of North-East Asia, will largely determine the strategic situation in the Asia-Pacific region and globally. The monograph by Anatoly Torkunov, Georgy Toloraya and Ilya Diachkov “Modern Korea: The Metamorphosis of turbulent years” is aimed at the consideration of the situation on and around the Peninsula from 2008 to the present. The monograph explores several major interconnected subjects: the domestic processes in South and North Koreas, the North-South relations, the nuclear issue of the Korean Peninsula and attempts to tackle the problem, the prospects for the formation of a multilateral security architecture in Northeast Asia, as well as Russia’s policy on the Peninsula and Russia’s relations with each of the two Korean states. Although some of the authors’ conclusions can be argued, the book, on the one hand, distinguishes a sober and realistic analysis of the processes on the Korean Peninsula, and, on the other hand, a sense of geopolitical empathy, allowing a better understanding of the motives that pushed North Korea on the nuclear and missile path. The authors of the monograph propose a visionary ‘North Pacific Project’ – an institution of cooperation of key actors in Northeast Asia and the North Pacific, in which it would be possible to interact not only on nuclear strategic issues, but also on a wide range of problems.
References
Bolton J. 2020. The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir. New York: Simon & Schuster
Buzan B., Waever O. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldstein A. 2000. Deterrence and Security in the 21st Century: China, Britain, France, and the Enduring Legacy of the Nuclear Revolution. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402344344
Korhonen P., Mori. T. 2019. North Korea as a Small Great Power. – The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. 01.03. URL: https://apjjf.org/2019/05/Korhonen.html (accessed 30.03.2021).
Suh J.J. 2004. Bound to Last? The U.S.-Korea Alliance and Analytical Eclecticism. – Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power, and Efficiency. Ed. by J.J. Suh, P.J. Katzenstein, A. Carlson. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. P. 131-171.
Thucydides. 2017. The Melian Dialogue. URL: https://we.hse.ru/data/2017/12/29/1160703552/Melosskiy_dialog.pdf (accessed 30.03.2021).
Torkunov A.V., Toloraya G.D., Dyachkov I.V. 2021. Sovremennaya Koreya: metamorfozy turbulentnykh let (2008–2020 gg.) [Modern Korea. Metamorphoses of Turbulent Years (2008–2020)]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publishers. 448 p. (In Russ.)
See also:
Fedorovsky A.N.,
Common history and different destinies of the two Korean states. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5
Toloraya G.D., Torkunov A.V.,
Nuclear and Missile Threat on the Korean Peninsula: Origins and Response Measures. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No4
Inoguchi T.,
Political Science in Three Democracies, Disaffected (Japan), Third Wave (Korea) and Fledgeling (China). – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No5
Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Streltsov D.V., Chugrov S.V., Karelova L.B., Oznobishchev S.K.,
Russia and Japan. Part II. View from Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1
Gandhi R.,
South Asia, Central Asia and Russia: hte Islamic Factor. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No3