Russia 2020: Alternative Scenarios and Public Preferences

Russia 2020:
Alternative Scenarios and Public Preferences


Melville A.Yu.,

Dr. Sci. (Phil.), Professor, Distinguished Scholar of Russia, Academic Supervisor and Dean, Faculty of Social Science, HSE University, amelville@hse.ru


elibrary_id: 251142 | ORCID: 0000-0002-1414-5783 | RESEARCHER_ID: B-1152-2014

Timofeev I.N.,

Cand. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Associate Professor of the Department of Political Theory, MGIMOUniversity; Program Director, Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), itimofeev@russiancouncil.ru


elibrary_id: 236879 | ORCID: 0000-0003-1676-2221 |

Rubric: Russia today

For citation:

Melville A.Yu., Timofeev I.N. Russia 2020: Alternative Scenarios and Public Preferences . – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No. 4



Abstract

In the article, on the basis of a scenario approach, possible trajectories of Russia’s future, up to 2020, are determined. Considered as driving forces of the scenarios are: influence of outside surroundings on Russia; character of socio-economic and political modernization; quality and characteristics of the political regime; logic of the relations between the center and the regions. Four alternative scenarios are analyzed: «the Kremlin gambit», «Stronghold Russia», «Russian mosaics», «New dream». By method of focus-groups, desirability and probability of realization of corresponding scenarios are determined, as depended on party preferences of the respondents. The research is crowned with a number of unexpected results insofar as it refers to the vision by respondents of the alternative trajectories of the country’s development and to the role of the party factor in guessing right the likeness and the difference of their positions.


Content No. 4, 2008

See also:


Solovyov A.I.,
Contradictions of Conciliatory Processes in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No5

Kuvaldin V.B., Malyutin M.V.,
From an “Electoral Pyramid” to the “Power Party”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

Tikhonova N.E.,
Russians’ Perceptions of the Relationship between the Individual and State Interests: an Empirical Analysis of Dynamics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No6

Rogozin D.M.,
Family Citizenship of the Youth in the Northern Caucasus. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Shestopal Ye.B.,
Quarter of a century of russian political reforms from a psychological point of view. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No1

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2015


Eremeev S.G.
Education in the modern political agenda

 Полный текст
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991