Гнев, идентичность или вера в успех? Динамика мотивации и участия в белорусских протестах 2020 года

---

Список литературы

Ахременко А.С., Беленков В.Е., Петров А.П. 2021. Логика протестных кампаний: от эмпирических данных к динамическим моделям (и обратно). Полис. Политические исследования. № 3. С. 147-165. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.03.10. EDN: DJQQMC.

Akhremenko, A., & Petrov, A. (2020). Modeling the protest-repression nexus. Proceedings of the MACSPro Workshop 2020. Venice, Italy, October 22-24. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. P. 1-11.

Ayanian, A.H., Tausch, N., Acar, Y.G., Chayinska, M., Cheung, W.-Y., & Lukyanova, Y. (2021). Resistance in repressive contexts: a comprehensive test of psychological predictors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 912-939. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000285

Ayanian, A.H., & Tausch, N. (2016). How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: a study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post‐coup uprising. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 700-721. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12164

Brodersen, K.H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S.L. (2015). inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-AOAS788

Cichocka, A., Górska, P., Jost, J.T., Sutton, R.M., & Bilewicz, M. (2018). What inverted U can do for your country: a curvilinear relationship between confidence in the social system and political engagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(5), 883-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000168

Corcoran, K.E., Pettinicchio, D., & Young, J. (2011). The context of control: a cross-national investigation of the link between political institutions, efficacy, and collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 575-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02076.x

Drury, J., & Reicher, S.D. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: a comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231

Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hornsey, M., Blackwood, L., Louis, W., Fielding, K., Mavor, K., Morton, T., O'Brien, A., Paasonen, K.-.A., Smith, J., & White, K.M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1701-1722.

Huddy, L. (2003). Group identity and political cohesion. In D.O Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 511-546). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, B., Neo, R., Heijnen, M., Smits, L., & van Veen, C. (2020). Issues, involvement, and influence: effects of selective exposure and sharing on polarization and participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.031

Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417

Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.

McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: the case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64-90.

Miller, D.A., Cronin, T., Garcia, A.L., Branscombe, N.R. (2009). Feelings of fear affect the relative impact of anger and efficacy on collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12(4), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209105046

Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229

Osborne, D., Jost, J. T., Becker, J.C., Badaan, V., & Sibley, C.G. (2019). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 244-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2522

Saab, R., Tausch, N., Spears, R. & Cheung, W. (2015). Acting in solidarity: testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by third parties. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 539-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12095

Schaefer, R. (2008). Racial and ethnic groups. 11-th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Sturmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: towards a dual pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 59-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280340000117

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Ed.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Thomas, E.F., Mavor, K.I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: a test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619

Tilly, Ch. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Turner, J.C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E.J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes (pp. 77-122). Greenwich: JAI Press.

Van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2007). Individuals in movements: a social psychology of contention. In C.M. Roggeband, & B. Klandermans (Ed.), The Handbook of Social Movements across Disciplines (pp. 157-204). New York, NY: Springer..

Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A.H., & Leach, C.W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649-664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649

Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

Van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F.M.H. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212467476

Walker, I., & Smith, H.J. (2002). Relative deprivation: specification, development, and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  

Возможно, Вас заинтересуют:

Костюшев В. В.,
Социальный протест в поле политики: потенциал, репертуар, дискурс (опыт теоретического понимания и эмпирической верификации). – Полис. Политические исследования. 2011. №4

Ахременко А. С., Стукал Д. К., Петров А. П.,
Сеть или текст? Факторы распространения протеста в социальных медиа: теория и анализ данных. – Полис. Политические исследования. 2020. №2

Рябченко Н. А., Малышева О. П., Гнедаш А. А.,
Управление политическим контентом в социальных сетях в период предвыборной кампании в эпоху постправды. – Полис. Политические исследования. 2019. №2

Ахременко А. С., Беленков В. Е., Петров А. П.,
Логика протестных кампаний: от эмпирических данных к динамическим моделям (и обратно). – Полис. Политические исследования. 2021. №3

Тимофеева Л. Н., Рябченко Н. А., Малышева О. П., Гнедаш А. А.,
Цифровая социально-политическая повестка дня и ее осмысление в условиях новой медиаэкологии. – Полис. Политические исследования. 2022. №2

---