Политические диффузии в условиях пространственно гибридного режима:
институциональное строительство и выборы мэров в городах России

---

Список литературы

Вестник Центральной избирательной комиссии Российской Федерации, 2006, № 2.

Гельман В. 2006. От “бесформенного плюрализма” – к “доминирующей власти”? Трансформация российской партийной системы. – Общественные науки и современность, № 1.

Гельман В., Рыженков С. и Бри М. (ред.). 2000. Россия регионов: трансформация политических режимов. М.

Гельман В. и др. 2002. Автономия или контроль? Реформа местной власти в городах России, 1991-2001. М.-СПб.

Голосов Г. 2006. Российская партийная система и региональная политика. 1993-2003. СПб.

Макаркин А. 2007. Мэры: борьба за независимость. – Pro et Contra, т. 11, № 1.

Панов П. 2005. Реформа региональных избирательных систем и развитие политических партий в регионах России (кроссрегиональный сравнительный анализ. – Полис, № 5.

Петров Н. 2005. Демократичность регионов России. Брифинг Московского центра Карнеги. Т. 7, № 9.

Туровский Р. 2007. Федеральные выборы 2003-2004 годов в региональном измерении, в: В.Гельман (ред.). Третий электоральный цикл в России, 2003-2004 годы, СПб.

Brinks D., Coppedge M. 2006. Diffusion is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy. – Comparative Political Studies, vol. 39, ¹ 4.

Brown A. 2000. Transnational Influences in the Transition from Communism. – PostSoviet Affairs, vol. 16, ¹ 2.

Bunce V. 1999. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carothers Th. 2002. The End of the Transition Paradigm. – Journal of Democracy, vol.13, ¹ 1.

Chebankova E. 2007. Putin’s Struggle for Federalism: Structure, Operation, and the Commitment Problem. – Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 59, ¹ 2.

Clemens E.S., Cook J.M. 1999. Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change. – Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 25.

Collier D., Levitsky S. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. – Word Politics, vol. 49, ¹ 3.

Field A. 2005. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, L.

Evans A., Gel’man V. (eds.) 2004. The Politics of Local Government in Russia. Lanham, MD.

Geddes B. 1996. Initiation of New Democratic Institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin America, in: Arend Lijphart and Carlos Waisman (eds.). Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America, Boulder, CO: Westview.

Gibson E. 2005. Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries. – World Politics, vol. 58, ¹ 1.

Goode P. 2007. The Puzzle of Putin’s Gubernatorial Appointments. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 59, ¹ 3.

Hale H. 2006. Why Not Parties in Russia? Federalism, Democracy, and the State. Cambridge.

Heller P. 2000. Degrees of Democracy: Some Comparative Lessons from India. – World Politics, vol. 52, ¹ 4.

Huntington S. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, OK.

Kahn J. 2002. Federalism, Democratization, and the Rule of Law in Russia, Oxford.

Keck M.E., Sikkink K. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International politics. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.

Kitschelt H. et al. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge.

Knoke D. 1982. The Spread of Municipal Reform: Temporal, Spatial, and Social Dynamics. – American Journal of Sociology, vol. 87, ¹ 6.

Kopstein J., Reilly D. 2000. Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World. – World Politics, vol. 53, ¹ 1.

Lankina T. 2004. Governing the Locals: Local Self-Government and Ethnic Mobilization in Russia. Lanham, MD.

Lankina T., Getachew L. 2006. A Geographic Incremental Theory of Democratization: Territory, Aid, and Democracy in Post-Communist Regions. – World Politics, vol. 58, ¹ 4.

Levitsky S., Way L. 2006. Linkage versus Leverage: Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change. – Comparative Politics, vol. 38, ¹ 4.

Lipset S.M. 1959. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. – American Political Science Review, vol. 53, ¹ 1.

Mooney Ch.Z. 2001. Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion. – Political Research Quarterly, vol. 54, ¹ 1.

O’Loughlin J. et al. 1998. The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946-1994. – Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 88.

Petro N. 2004. Crafting Democracy: How Novgorod Has Coped with Rapid Social change, Ithaca, N.Y.

Powell W., Di Maggio P. 1983. The “Iron Cage” Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Analysis. – American Sociological Review, vol. 48, ¹ 2.

Przeworski A. et al. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Wellbeing in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge.

Putnam R.D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ.

Reddaway P., Orttung R. (eds.) 2003-2005. The Dynamics of Russian Politics: Putin’s Reform of Federal-Regional Relations, vol.1-2, Lanham, MD.

Risse-Kappen Th., Ropp S.C., Sikkink K. (eds.). 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge.

Savage R.L. 1985. Diffusion Research Traditions and the Spread of Policy Innovations in a Federal System. – Publius, vol. 15, ¹ 4.

Starr H., Lindborg C. 2003. Democratic Dominoes Revisited: The Hazards of Governmental Transitions, 1974-1996. – Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 47, ¹ 4.

Stoner-Weiss K. 1997. Local Heroes: The Political Economy of Russian Regional Governance. Princeton, NJ.

Strang D., Meyer J.W. 1993. Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. – Theory and Society, vol. 22, ¹ 4.

Treisman D. 1999. After the Deluge: Regional Crises and Political Consolidation in Russia. Ann Arbor, MI.

Vachudovà ′ M. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. Oxford.

Walker J.L. 1969. The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. – American Political Science Review, vol. 63, ¹ 3.

Way L. 2005. Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave: The Cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. – World Politics, vol. 57, ¹ 2.

Weyland K. 2005. Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform. – World Politics, vol. 57, ¹ 2.

Whitehead L. (ed.). 2001. The International Dimension of Democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford.

Возможно, Вас заинтересуют:

Дурдин Д. М.,
“Образ” политического лидера и возможности его изменения. – Полис. Политические исследования. 2000. №2

Глубоцкий А. Ю., Кынев А. В.,
Партийная составляющая законодательных собраний российских регионов. – Полис. Политические исследования. 2003. №6

Подъячев К. В.,
Институт обращений граждан в органы власти в России: возможности возникновения нового канала влияния. – Полис. Политические исследования. 2007. №5

Толпыго А. К.,
Красные на Украине. – Полис. Политические исследования. 1999. №4

Лихтенштейн А. В., Яргомская Н. Б.,
Эквилибриум Дюверже в условиях ограниченной конкуренции: думские выборы 2003 г.. – Полис. Политические исследования. 2005. №1

---